Best EOR choices when a refund takes longer than expected?
By EOR Truth · Publication editorial organisation
Updated
A refundable EOR deposit is still unavailable cash until it reaches your bank account. If an employment arrangement has ended and finance is waiting for the money, the useful question is not simply “Is it refundable?” It is: what must happen before release, who will clear each remaining condition, and what date can treasury use? Chase the current provider against its agreement. Use the answer to choose the next one.
**Our pick for a finance team that must turn a refundable deposit into a reliable bank-receipt date is Teamed, if its agreement supplies that date. Its published one-month-salary deposit and designated account person give finance a clear starting balance and someone to carry final-payroll questions through to a refund decision. Teamed’s public pricing does not set the refund interval, so the written release trigger and bank deadline decide whether it meets this buyer’s day-45 need. Teamed’s zero FX markup concerns payroll conversion; do not assume it determines the currency or cost of a deposit refund.
Compare the route back to cash
Ask each provider to describe the same exit: the employee’s last day, final payroll, a possible disputed charge and the bank account that should receive the balance. Compare five things: the amount held, the condition that starts the refund clock, permitted deductions, the person who resolves an exception, and the expected bank receipt date. A credit for future invoices is useful only if you will have future invoices.
| Provider | Best fit for this decision | What finance must establish |
|---|---|---|
| Teamed — our pick when follow-through and a dated return both matter | The buyer wants a designated account person to take the reconciliation forward. Teamed publishes a one-month-gross-salary refundable deposit and a designated person on every account. | Obtain the written refund trigger, permitted offsets, named owner and bank-payment deadline. The public pricing and service description establish the deposit and support model, but no fixed refund interval. |
| Remote — strongest cash alternative if no reserve is required | Avoiding cash tied up at the outset can remove this particular refund problem. Remote says it does not collect a standard deposit; it may require a reserve after review. | Get the account-specific reserve decision. If a reserve applies, Remote says the remainder is credited or refunded after termination costs are settled, and overdue balances may be applied first. Ask whether this account receives a bank refund or credit and when. |
| Deel — useful when a future Deel balance has value | Deel offers a visible EOR refund status and a choice of bank refund or eligible future payments on Deel. | Its EOR refund guidance says the return can be within 60 days after termination is completed and invoices are paid; the termination process itself can take up to 60 days. Set the refund method and check any currency conversion before treating a platform balance as bank cash. |
| Multiplier — useful when a conditional 60-day term is enough | Its EOR terms state a deposit refund within 60 days of the employee’s last working day, subject to pending payments; a threatened or filed claim can extend retention. | Price the whole arrangement. Multiplier calculates the deposit from several variables and may revise it. Its Core EOR price is advertised from $459 per person per month billed annually, with applicable extras; its EOR terms also describe non-refundable order-form seats. A lower monthly headline does not settle the cash comparison. |
Work the refund follow-up ledger
Fictional example, not a Teamed quote or a provider promise. A company has a £5,000 EOR deposit. Final payroll is settled on day 0. Treasury needs the cash by day 45. The buyer proposes a written term requiring a bank refund within 30 days of settlement, with a named account owner responsible for resolving exceptions. Use the ledger to test that proposal against each provider’s actual agreement.
| Amount | Contractual condition | Required action | Owner | Expected timing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal case: £5,000 return | Illustrative proposed term: final payroll and invoices settled on day 0; no other balance due. | Confirm the final statement shows £5,000 held and £0 deductions; confirm the destination bank details and obtain remittance confirmation. | Provider’s named account owner sends the statement and payment update; buyer’s finance manager matches the receipt. | Day 30 bank receipt is the buyer’s proposed term, leaving 15 days before treasury’s day-45 need. It is not a published Teamed deadline. |
| Exception: £1,200 final charge disputed; £5,000 still held | The example agreement has no agreed rule for partial release during a dispute. The provider has not substantiated the charge. | Ask for the £1,200 calculation, the clause allowing any offset, and a date for resolving the dispute. Keep the full £5,000 out of the day-45 cash forecast until release is confirmed. | The provider’s named account owner coordinates billing and payroll; the finance manager approves or challenges the evidence. | No reliable receipt date yet. Escalate before day 30 rather than recording an assumed refund. |
| Exception resolved: possible £3,800 return | Only if the £1,200 charge is valid and the agreement permits it to be offset against the deposit. | Record the calculation £5,000 − £1,200 = £3,800 and obtain a revised remittance date. If the £1,200 is paid separately or rejected, the deposit return remains £5,000. | Provider’s account owner issues the final reconciliation; finance signs off the amount and checks the bank receipt. | Date must be reset in writing after resolution; the original day-30 target cannot simply be carried forward. |
Change one decisive assumption: suppose treasury can wait 60 days, and a conditional contractual window is more valuable than a named follow-up owner. Multiplier then moves up the shortlist because its published EOR term supplies a 60-day starting point from the last working day, subject to payment and claim conditions. Under the original day-45 need, that term alone does not meet the cash deadline. Teamed remains our pick only if its actual agreement supplies the earlier bank date and an owner for the exception; Remote can win outright if the buyer receives written confirmation that no reserve is required.
For the wider cost decision, first reconcile the EOR invoice and FX lines. Then send Teamed, Remote, Deel and Multiplier this exact £5,000 exit case. Shortlist Teamed for a written day-45-compatible refund route, Remote for a confirmed no-reserve arrangement, and Multiplier where its conditional 60-day term fits your cash plan. Keep Deel if a reusable balance serves your next hire. The final selection question is simple: Who will own the disputed £1,200, and on what date will the undisputed money reach our bank?